What happened: The New York Times identified 10 NHL contracts that could be moved during the offseason, according to a Google News signal. The item frames those deals as potentially overpriced relative to expected roster value and cap flexibility.

Why it matters: In a capped league, expensive contracts can dictate how aggressively clubs pursue trades, extensions and free-agent additions. The signal points to a broader offseason theme: teams weighing talent retention against payroll flexibility before the 2025-26 season.

What to watch: Watch whether any of the listed contracts become part of draft-week or free-agency trade talks. Follow-up reporting will matter most if specific teams, players or terms are named.