What happened: A post on the r/nba community proposes cataloguing essentially every basketball statistic and grading each one on usefulness and other characteristics. The author frames it as a crowd-informed reference rather than a reaction to any game, trade, or roster move.

Why it matters: Debates over which metrics carry real signal are a recurring fault line among fans, with traditional box-score totals often weighed against efficiency and impact measures. A ground-up ranking attempts to give that argument a shared starting point.

What to watch: Watch whether the thread converges on a usable tier list of metrics or splinters into the familiar counting-stats-versus-advanced-stats disagreement.